


Table of Contents
Share with network
Related Insights
Fifteen years after the financial crisis that led to its creation and six and a half years since the issuance of ASU 2016-13, the implementation date for current expected credit loss methodology (CECL) has finally come and gone. As with many areas of CECL, regulatory guidance explaining when model validations are warranted versus when an internal audit may be appropriate, has been infrequent and ambiguous. To make this determination more confusing, there are wide-ranging definitions of the word “validation” being used by vendors across the industry. In this article, we discuss the difference between an internal audit and a validation and provide some perspective on items to be considered when making the determination as to which is more appropriate for your institution.
[hubspot portal="23546948" id="8511bf87-e8d6-4949-a93f-5c445707f203" type="form"]


Explore where internal controls break down in financial services and how ICFR deficiencies, like weak oversight, poor risk assessment, and inadequate monitoring, can lead to financial misstatements. Learn strategies to strengthen your control environment and protect reporting integrity.


Discover why BSA/AML models are falling short of examiner expectations and how financial institutions can strengthen compliance programs amid evolving regulations, staffing challenges, and emerging risks like cartel-linked activity and crypto exposure.