The passage of the Tax Cuts and Jobs Act (TCJA) in late 2017 brought significant changes to the tax landscape. As the first tax season under the law draws near, new year-end tax planning strategies are emerging. Some of the tried-and-true strategies have changed, while others remain viable.
The TCJA creates several new avenues of potential tax savings for businesses. Some of these, though, may require leaders to make some tough decisions.
For example, the new tax law has prompted some businesses to question whether they should restructure to become a C corporation or a pass-through entity. C corporations are subject to potential double taxation (at the entity and dividend levels), but they now enjoy a federal corporate tax rate that has decreased from 35% to 21%. Pass-through entities, on the other hand, face an individual tax rate, which can run as high as 37%; however, these types of companies may qualify for a new, full 20% deduction on qualified business income (QBI).
With a full QBI deduction, the maximum effective tax rate for pass-through entities comes out to 29.6%. But there are other factors to consider. For example, the TCJA limits the state and local tax deduction for individual pass-through owners, but not for corporations. Additionally, the new corporate rate is permanent, while the QBI deduction is scheduled to end in 2025.
Ultimately, the optimal business classification depends on each organization’s situation and circumstances. That said, businesses that are structured as pass-through entities can take advantage of several tactics that maximize QBI deductions.
It’s important to note that the deduction is subject to limits based on W-2 wages paid, the unadjusted basis of the taxpayer’s qualified property, and taxable income. A business, therefore, might increase its wages by converting independent contractors to employees, assuming the benefit isn’t outweighed by higher payroll taxes, employee benefit costs, and similar considerations. The company could also purchase assets before year-end to increase its unadjusted basis. Meanwhile, individual pass-through owners can maximize their above-the-line and itemized deductions to reduce their taxable income.
The TCJA also establishes a business tax credit for paid family and medical leave—a credit that businesses can claim for 2018, provided they adopt a retroactive policy before the end of the year. Eligible employers may claim the credit if they have a written policy that allows at least two weeks of annual paid family and medical leave to all employees who meet certain requirements, at a pay rate of at least 50% of normal wages. The maximum credit is 25% of wages paid during leave.
Not surprisingly, the TCJA alters several year-end strategies that businesses have used in the past to curb liability. It bolsters some strategies, while trimming or ending the advantages of others.
For several years, asset acquisitions have offered a smart way to cut taxes through bonus depreciation and Section 179 depreciation deductions. The TCJA expands both types of deductions, potentially making investments in equipment and other assets even more advisable. In this scenario, businesses could immediately write off 50% bonus depreciation on qualified new property purchased in 2017.
The TCJA extends and modifies bonus depreciation for qualified property purchased after September 27, 2017, and before January 1, 2023. Businesses can expense the entire cost of such property (both new and used, subject to certain conditions) in the year the property is placed into service. The amount of the allowable deduction will begin to phase out in 2023, decreasing 20% each year for four years until it disappears in 2027, absent congressional action. It’s worth noting that certain property with a longer production period will be eligible for the bonus depreciation for an extra year, as the phaseout doesn’t start until 2024.
Before TCJA became law, depreciable assets included new computers, software, vehicles, machinery, equipment, office furniture, and qualified improvement property (QIP), generally defined as interior improvements to nonresidential real property. However, Congress removed QIP from the definition of qualified property eligible for bonus depreciation, intending that it would nonetheless remain eligible because its recovery period would be reduced to 15 years. (Qualified property must have a recovery period of 20 years or less.) Due to a drafting error, however, the TCJA didn’t define QIP as 15-year property, so it defaults to a 39-year recovery period. Without a technical correction or regulatory guidance, QIP won’t qualify for bonus depreciation in 2018.
That said, QIP placed in service after December 31, 2017, is eligible for immediate expensing (deducting the entire cost) under Sec. 179. The TCJA expands this deprecation to include several improvements to nonresidential real property such as roofs, HVAC, fire protection systems, alarm systems, and security systems. It also increases the maximum deduction for qualifying property $510,000 to $1 million in 2017. (The maximum deduction remains limited to the amount of income from business activity.) Moreover, the TCJA raises the phaseout threshold from $2.03 million to $2.5 million in 2017.
Businesses traditionally have used employee benefits to reduce their tax liability as well, but the TCJA narrows the benefits-related opportunities. For example, it eliminates or tightens tax breaks for transportation benefits, on-premises meals, moving expenses reimbursement, and achievement awards. (Some of these changes are only temporary.) Organizations might, however, reap tax benefits from Health Savings Accounts, Flexible Spending Accounts, Health Reimbursement Accounts, health insurance, and group term-life insurance. What’s more, a business could have nontax-related reasons, such as employee recruitment and retention, to offer certain benefits.
Although many tax credits were in the crosshairs as the TCJA was drafted, several of the most popular survived, including the Work Opportunity tax credit, Small Business Health Care tax credit, the New Markets tax credit and the research credit.
The TCJA even boosts the value of the research credit. That’s because taxpayers generally must either reduce their business deductions by the amount of their research credit or take a reduced research credit to preempt a double tax benefit. The reduced credit is computed based on the maximum corporate tax rate. By cutting that rate from 35% to 21%, the TCJA increases the net benefit of the research credit to 79%, compared to 65% in previous years.
Businesses looking to trim their tax bills can also continue deferring income into 2019 and accelerating deductions into 2018. For example, a company that uses cash-basis accounting might “slow roll” its invoices to push the receivables into the new year, or prepay expenses. Notably, the TCJA has greatly expanded eligibility for cash-basis accounting, making it generally available to businesses with three-year average annual gross receipts of $25 million or less.
There’s still time
Whether your business operates on a calendar- or fiscal-year basis, your 2018 tax bill isn’t yet written in stone. It’s not too late to implement some strategies that reduce your business’s tax liabilities and improve its bottom line.
To learn more about year-end tax planning and how you can reduce your business’s exposure, contact your Elliott Davis tax advisor.
The information provided in this communication is of a general nature and should not be considered professional advice. You should not act upon the information provided without obtaining specific professional advice. The information above is subject to change.